Last week my brother sent me a link to a video called “Fire the Wrong People Today.” In summary, he says that it’s as important to get rid of the lousy workers as it is to hire excellent ones. I thought about this in a couple different contexts, among them office work, music, and education. Here’s what I think:
I agree with him for the most part, but I’d like to talk about why and how. I work in software now, though for the last 8 years academia has been my life. In the video he’s talking about a business environment, and business environments have a very concrete measurement of success: money. The bottom line of good leadership is financial success. But what’s interesting, is that good leadership means getting the right people to do the right things. And he comments on it in the first couple minutes; highly qualified people will work together to get things done. If they don’t, they’re not really qualified, and therefore not really a good employee no matter their individual skill set.
In a follow-up conversation with my brother, I said that the gist of the video is:
- Here are your objectives and the metric by which you shall be measured
- I see that you are not meeting your goals, so here is some support to help you succeed
- You still are not meeting our desired objective, so you are not a good fit.
That seems cut and dried, and it’s never quiet as surgical a conversation as that, but it’s an interesting perspective to think about life.
I’ve seen that things are a good bit more difficult to pin down in higher education. Sure, there are milestones such as completion of a terminal degree, tenure, advancement, publishing papers, etc. But those tend to be subjective and different for each person. Well-run departments are structured enough to handle some of the gray areas, and keep the right people. But students know that bad professors get tenure and spend decades teaching poorly. That’s where Rate My Professors came from.
It’s not that universities are cesspools of incompetence, it’s that the gray areas are big enough that incompetence can slip in. And education just happens to be one of those areas where people really remember incompetence. People remember excellent teachers too, but like the old saying goes, “the squeaky wheel gets the grease.” That is to say, complainers get more attention, and what’s worth complaining about more than bad teachers and managers?
I thought about the “fire the wrong ones” mentality about music, and that’s where I really think there’s some traction. I’ve played with a good number of chamber groups over the years, and personal chemistry is nearly everything. I’ve played with some mediocre players and made great music because of the fit. I’ve played with some very strong players but struggled to get anything out of it because of poor fit. At some point, you have to decide who in the group is the weakest link. Who in the group is upsetting the chemistry. And who is in charge?
My last thought is thinking about firing in terms of habit. If you are the CEO of “You, Inc.,” you are in charge of your own strengths and weaknesses. Like running a team of professionals, you manage a group of skills and talents; abilities that allow you to get through your day. Maybe you measure success in dollars, in a car, the size of a TV, or personal satisfaction. Maybe your strengths have made some of your path very easy, or your weaknesses have made it hard.
But what I thought about in terms of “firing” was being aware of how your own employees work together, and how you need to pay as much attention to your weakness as to your strength. In this case, I’m talking about habits. Know what holds you back.
How often do we shrug off what we’re not good at and say, “Eh, that’s not what I do.” How often do you hear yourself making excuses for something, or worse yet, just avoiding it entirely?
In the past I’ve told my students that the most powerful of human activities is habit. Sometimes we choose good ones, but know that if you don’t, you have the option to fire them.